Five billion, eight hundred million
We’re looking at an estimated 5.8 billion dollars being spent by the presidential and congressional races to buy your vote this year. According to Time Magazine, the combined amount Mitt Romney and Barack Obama will spend on their presidential campaigns is 2.5 billion dollars. I hope you love presidential mud-slinging commercials; there’s going to be a lot of them as we near Election Day. I could spend an entire article discussing how the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United changed the political landscape, but I’m trying to avoid putting my readers to sleep…unlike my previous blog posts.
It’s extremely hard to put 5.8 billion into perspective. Especially for us living off of research scientists salaries. But let’s see what else we could buy with that money.
15.3% of scientific funding appropriated by the NIH (30.9 billion) and NSF (7.0 billion) in fiscal year 2012.
We could send two more Curiosity rovers to Mars (2.5 billion a piece). The extra 800 million could be used to equip them with flipper arms and circular saw blades to create a NASA version of Robot Wars. Seriously, can someone bring that television show back?
Google could buy Groupon, again….and again (2.5 billion acquisition). Maybe a third time if they offered a groupon.
A little more than a third of the cost of the London Olympics.
We could fund 145,000 post-doctoral positions for 1 year ($40K each). This would actually help provide the jobs necessary for President Obama’s mission to increase the number of scientists and engineers in the US.
Apple? No. We’re not nearly in that ball park. Current estimates put cash on hand at over $110 billion. But give it a few more presidential elections and we might reach that mark.
Even though politicians will spend all this money, little attention is given to scientific topics. Why? First, topics like stem cell research and alternative energy are hot button issues that are bound to upset large groups of people regardless of how the question is answered. Second, the majorities of politicians know very little about scientific research and simply don’t want to look foolish. This might explain why the focus always goes to the ethics of scientific research rather than the actual implications of the research itself.
While RateMyPI.com has no political affiliations, we would like to encourage you to turn off the television (or at least forward through the election commercials) and head over to AAAS.org for a breakdown of the presidential candidates Science and Technology platforms. Let’s make informed voting decisions this election rather than allowing the politicians to simply buy our vote.